Message

Reinette (Oonsie) Biggs

Reinette (Oonsie) Biggs

Tuesday, 18 October 2011 08:54

How can you contribute?

The site is intended to function as a high-quality Wikipedia-like space. We warmly welcome all contributions! You can contribute by:

  • Adding additional figures or references to existing examples
  • Adding comments to existing examples to suggest how the text might be improved or expanded
  • Adding new examples of regime shifts or case studies
  • Suggesting possible new examples that we might add to the database
  • Sending us general comments and suggestions for improving this website
Tuesday, 18 October 2011 08:34

How do regime shifts work?

Different regimes can be metaphorically represented by a ball-and-cup diagram. The valleys or cups represent different regimes or fundamental ways in which the system can function and be structured. A regime shift entails a shift in the current system state (represented as a ball) from one cup or valley to another. While in a particular regime, it is important to note that the system does not remain stable but fluctuates around.

 

 

Regime shifts result from a change in the dominant feedbacks. All complex systems contain many feedback loops, but these can typically evolve and combine in only a limited number of ways. Over time, a particular combination of feedbacks will tend to become dominant, leading the system to self-organize into a particular structure and function – or "regime". However, if the system experiences a large shock (eg a volcano) or persistent directional change (eg accumulation of pollutants, habitat loss) the dominant feedbacks may be overwhelmed or eroded. At some point a critical threshold may be passed where a different set of feedbacks become dominant, and the system experiences a large, often abrupt change in structure and function – or a "regime shift".

Saturday, 26 February 2011 11:15

Lake Mendota, Wisconsin, USA

Lake Mendota, Wisconsin, USA

Main Contributors:

Reinette (Oonsie) Biggs

Other Contributors:

Summary

Lake Mendota is located in south central Wisconsin in the Upper Rock Watershed. It has been called the most studied lake in the world and has been studied since the 1880’s. Cyanobacterial blooms have been reported on Lake Mendota as early as 1976 with a very severe bloom in the spring of 1990. Many efforts have been made to reduce the frequency of harmful algal blooms on Lake Mendota.

Type of regime shift

Ecosystem type

  • Freshwater lakes & rivers

Land uses

  • Urban
  • Large-scale commercial crop cultivation

Spatial scale of the case study

  • Local/landscape (e.g. lake, catchment, community)

Continent or Ocean

  • North America

Region

  • Wisconsin

Countries

  • United States

Locate with Google Map

Key References

  1. Carpenter SR, et al. 2006. Understanding regional change: comparison of two lake districts. BioScience
  2. Carpenter SR, Lathrop RC, Nowak P, Bennett EM, Reed T, Soranno PA. 2006b. The ongoing experiment: Restoration of Lake Mendota and its watershed. In Magnuson JJ, Kratz TK, Benson BJ, eds. Long-term dynamics of lakes in the landscape: Long-term ecological research on north temperate lakes. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  3. Carpenter SR. 2003. Regime shifts in lake ecosystems: pattern and variation. Oldendorf/Luhe, Germany: International Ecology Institute.
  4. http://lakemendota.uwcfl.org/lake-mendota/

Citation

Reinette (Oonsie) Biggs. Lake Mendota, Wisconsin, USA. In: Regime Shifts Database, www.regimeshifts.org. Last revised 2012-03-17 19:16:32 GMT.
Tuesday, 15 February 2011 11:54

Maradi Agro-ecosystem

Maradi Agro-ecosystem

Main Contributors:

Johnny Musumbu Tshimpanga

Other Contributors:

Garry Peterson, Reinette (Oonsie) Biggs, Elin Enfors

Summary

Niger’s landscapes in general, particularly in Maradi have undergone a regime shift from a highly productive to a desert-dominated regime. The productive regime was maintained by land use characterized by scattered rural populations cultivating small fields amidst surrounding bush. Yields were sufficient and there were abundant supplies of forest products made possible by wet climatic conditions. The implementation of a new land law established the national government as the owner of all trees and provided disincentives for farmers to care for their land. This led to the exposure of soils to the Sahara winds resulting in erosion and accelerating desertification. This resulted in hunger and destitute among many people. Key institutional changes with regards to land tenure and tree growth were put in place along with simple soil and water conservation techniques, rock lining, improved versions of traditional planting pits or tasa, and demi-lunes which have reversed desertification. This process has reduced erosion and increased fertility and crop production, income, food security, and self-reliance to impoverished rural producers.

Type of regime shift

  • Desertification

Ecosystem type

  • Drylands & deserts (below ~500mm rainfall/year)

Land uses

  • Small-scale subsistence crop cultivation
  • Extensive livestock production (natural rangelands)

Spatial scale of the case study

  • Sub-continental/regional (e.g. southern Africa, Amazon basin)

Continent or Ocean

  • Africa

Region

  • Sahel

Countries

  • Niger

Locate with Google Map

Drivers

Key direct drivers

  • Vegetation conversion and habitat fragmentation
  • Environmental shocks (eg floods)
  • Global climate change

Land use

  • Small-scale subsistence crop cultivation
  • Extensive livestock production (rangelands)

Impacts

Key Ecosystem Processes

  • Soil formation
  • Nutrient cycling
  • Water cycling

Biodiversity

  • Biodiversity

Provisioning services

  • Freshwater
  • Food crops
  • Livestock
  • Timber
  • Woodfuel
  • Wild animal and plant foods

Regulating services

  • Water regulation
  • Regulation of soil erosion

Human Well-being

  • Food and nutrition
  • Livelihoods and economic activity

Key Attributes

Spatial scale of RS

  • Sub-continental/regional

Time scale of RS

  • Decades

Reversibility

  • Unknown

Evidence

  • Contemporary observations

Confidence: Existence of RS

  • Well established – Wide agreement in the literature that the RS exists

Confidence: Mechanism underlying RS

  • Well established – Wide agreement on the underlying mechanism

Alternate regimes

Productive Land Use Regime


The productive land use regime in Maradi Region as well as in the rest of Niger consists of a landscape characterised by sparse rural populations cultivating small fields amidst surrounding bush. Population densities are smaller with sufficient yields and ample supplies of timber and other forest products from natural woodlands. Fallow practices are common allowing fields to rest, and trees and shrubs are regenerated to provide extra wood before being cleared for planting (Winterbottom 2008). The most important feature of this regime is the fallow time which allows the environment to keep its natural productive capacity intact and provide a host of services such as soil and water conservation, increased soil fertility and goods among which food crops and fuel-wood in abundance. More importantly is that that productive period coincided with the wet decades that spanned from 1900 through with higher rainfalls during the 1920s, 1930s and 1950 (Hulme 2001).


Desert Regime 


The desert regime traces back to early 1960s, punctuated by the increasingly episode that commenced in the Sahel in the late 1960s, and which culminated in severe droughts in 1973, 1984 and 1990 (Warren 1995), and continues today. It is generally depicted as a regime characterised by an ongoing depreciation in ecosystem services and goods and moving towards a desert ecosystem. The landscapes are dominated by vast expanses of savannah devoid of vegetation under desertification threats until the early 1980s. This has resulted from a series of practices as a consequences of the enactment of institutional arrangements and enforced by both the French colonial government as well as the successive post-colonial governments. This regime regime illustrates high degrees of erosion and decreased soil fertility which has resulted in poverty and destitution translated into hunger, malnutrition, imbalanced diets and sometimes massive death.




Drivers and causes of the regime shift

Land clearing and tree-felling became common in the 1930s as the colonial administration pushed Nigerien farmers to grow export crops (cotton) and implemented policies that provided disincentives for farmers to care for their land (World Resources report 2008). Such disincentives included a new land law that established the national government as the owner of all trees and required Nigeriens to purchase permits to use them (Brough & Kimenyi 2002). By clearing native trees and shrubs, farmers exposed their lands to the fierce Sahara winds, resulting in plummeting soil fertility and harvests as a result of increased erosion. The loss of tree cover also triggered a rural fuel-wood crisis. Poor households were forced to burn animal dung or crop residues instead of using them for compost, reinforcing the downward spiral in soil quality and crop yields declines (Rinaudo 2007; Winterbottom 2008). Incidentally that resulted in an increase in intensity of cultivation of land reducing thus the fallow time to keep up with the production levels needed to feed an increasing human population which made it that woodlands were to be converted into farmland. That, in turn, contributed to land clearing and tree-felling and the cycle repeated itself in a reinforcing feedback loop.


 


The shrinking of Niger’s natural tree cover was exacerbated by a rapid population growth. That was a result of the perversely positive outcomes of the effective French health care system, notably higher life expectancy and lower infant mortality which incidentally increased a strain on natural resources (Brough & Kimenyi 2002). Therefore by 1975 much of the remaining natural woodland had been converted to farm fields to feed rapidly growing rural communities increasing consequently intensity of land cultivation which, in turn, reduces yield per hectare making food production one of recurrent problem for food security. As a result, the practice of fallow was abandoned altogether. By 2015, the Niger’s population will rise to 18.8 million and the area of cultivable land per capita will fall further- from 1.45 to 1.12 ha per person (Wentling 2008). But by clearing native trees and shrubs, farmers exposed their fields to the fierce winds, resulting in plummeting soil fertility and thereby harvests. In addition to the damaging effects of Sahara winds, the latter destroyed seeds in Niger’s June-to-October growing season that resulted more often in repeating sowing, destroying newly planted crops. The third and last driver is a series of an extreme 4-year drought that triggered famine across the Sahel in general through yield failures by impairing moisture in crop root zone, afflicting 50 million of people (Dan Baria 1999). Over the last 45 years, Niger has been plagued by an average of one bad harvest every eight years, following a growing season of low rainfall (Wentling 2008). That has exposed farmers to deadly cyclical droughts, which are predicted to increase as a result of climate change (Reij 2006; IPCC, 2007). These frequents droughts henceforth have increased rainfall variability that jeopardise bio-productivity of the system under study.


 


 


 


 

Impacts on ecosystem services and human well-being

The shift from a productive land use to a desert regime has direct impact on biodiversity of the area, causes soil erosion and decreases productivity therefore affecting provisioning services such as fuel-wood, and food for the local communities.


This has a direct impact on human wellbeing as it has increased poverty, hunger, malnutrition, imbalanced diets and sometimes even death.

Management options

Much of hope that has reversed desertification has come from the transformation of vast expanses of savannah devoid of vegetation into relatively densely studded landscapes with trees, shrubs, and crops. That has been achieved through an unprecedented, farmer-led re-greening movement initiated by the Maradi Integrated Development Project (MIDP) featuring a new approach to reforestation (Rinaudo 2005). This approach consists of low-cost techniques for managing the natural regeneration of trees and shrubs, known as farmer-managed natural regeneration, or FMNR. These techniques involved supporting the regeneration of trees and their sustainable management to produce continuous supplies of fuel-wood as well as non-timber products such as edible seeds and leaves. MIDP’s effort entailed few rules emphasizing farmer experimentation and choice. In fact, farmers chose how many trees stumps to let re-sprout in their fields, how many re-sprouted stems to grow and harvest, and what to do with the wood (Rinaudo 2005). By planting alternate rows of neem (Azadirachta indica) -an exotic nursery-grown species –and a native Acasia nilotica saplings across the valley to act as windbreaks, this techniques improved soil retention and fertility (Steinberg 1988). Re-vegetation also improves the traditional poor fertility of Niger’s soils, which in turn boosts crop production. Bush trees dotted across fields help hold soil in place, reducing wind and water erosion (Guero & Dan Lamso 2006). Moreover, the growing season on land with trees is longer because farmers only have to sow once, compared with twice or more on fields unprotected from the elements (Rinaudo 2005; Reij 2008). Such benefits are magnified when farmers act collectively. Vegetation in one field affects nearby land by serving as a windbreak and promoting improved water infiltration and soil retention (Winterbottom 2007). Besides the FMNR much of the success of the re-greening movement can also be attributed to the simultaneous soil and conservation work. In fact, simple soil and water conservation techniques were used to rehabilitate barren land. These widely adopted techniques consist of rock lining, improved versions of traditional planting pits or tasa, and demi-lunes that improve water infiltration into soil thereby increasing moisture in the root zone (Abdoulaye and Ibro, 2006). These techniques enabled cultivation of secondary vegetable crops such as onions, tomatoes, sweet potatoes, cow peas, watermelon, and asparagus for home use and sale in local markets (Guero & Dan Lamso 2006). This simple and cost-effective practice of farmer-managed natural regeneration has provided an impressively wide range of benefits for Niger’s impoverish rural communities. Over the last 30 years or so, about 200 million trees have been protected and managed by farmers in the FMNR regions and at least 250,000 ha of degraded land has been restored to crop production (Reij 2008; McGahuey & Winterbottom; 2007). On the other hand, there has been a perceptible trend in the increase in rainfall that has recently been noticed across the Sahel region as a whole that might also account for that change that is happening.

Key References

  1. Abdoulaye T. and G Ibro. 2006. Analyse des impacts socio-economiques des investissements dans la Gestion des Resources Naturelles: Etudes de Cas dans les Regions de Maradi, Tahoua, et Tillabery au Niger. Report part of Etudes Saheliennes, Papers presented at Conference of Study Results of Natural Resource Management Investments from 1980 to 2005 in Niger, Sept. 20-21. Comite Permanent Inter-Etats de lute Contre la Secgeresse Dans le Sahel. Online at http://www.frameweb.org/ev_en.php?ID=17812_201&ID_TOPIC
  2. Agnew CT. 1989. Spatial aspects of drought in the Sahel. Journal of Arid Environments 18, 279-293.
  3. Boubacar Y, M Larwanou, A Hassan, C Reij & International Resources group. 2005. Niger Study: Sahel Pilot Study Report. Washington, DC: United States Agency for International Development. Online at http://www.frameweb.org/ev_en.php?ID=13117_201&ID2=D0_TOPIC -Brough, Y., and Kimenyi. 2002. “Desertification” of the Sahel- Explorating the Role of property Rights. Bozeman, MT: Property and Environment Resource Center. Online at http://www.perc.org/.perc.php?id=142
  4. Dan Baria S. 1999. Evolution et Perspectives en Matiere de Gestion des Forets Naturelles au Niger: Quels Progres et quel avenir? Niamey: Conseil National de l’Environnement pour un Developpement Durable.
  5. Guéro C. & N. Dan Lamso. 2006. Les Projets de Restaurarion des Resources Naturelles et de la Fertilité des sols. Report part of Etudes Saheliennes, Papera presented at Conference of Study Results of Natural Resource Management Investments from 1980 t0 2005 in Niger, Sept.20-21. Comite permanent Inter-Etats de Lutte Contre la Secheresse Dans le Sahel. Online at http://www.frameweb.org/ev_en.php?ID=17817_201&ID2=DO-TOPIC
  6. Hulme M. 2001. Climatic perspectives on Sahelian dessication: 1973-1998. Global Environmental Change 11 (2001) 19-29.
  7. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2007. Fourth Assessment Report: Working Group II Report on Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Geneva: IPCC. Online at http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/ar4-wg2.htm
  8. McGahuey M. & Winterbottom. 2007 . Transformation Development in Niger. Power point. Jan. Online at http://www.frameweb.org/ev_en.php?ID=23670_201&ID2=DO-TOPIC
  9. McGhuey M. 2008. Environment and Natural Resource Management Advisor. USAID, Washington, DC. Personal Communication. Jan.14 and 16, Feb. 11 and 19: Roots of resilience : WR2008 report.
  10. Mortimore M. 1989. Adaptation to drought: Farmers, Famines, and Desertification in Western Africa. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  11. Polgreen, L. 2007. “In Niger, Trees and Crops Turn Back the Desert”. New York Times. Feb. 11.
  12. Reij C. 2006. More Success Stories in Africa’s Drylands than Often Assumed.Notes presented at forum sur la Souverainete Alimentaire, Niamey, Nov. 7-10. Niamey, Niger: Reseau des Organisations Paysannes et de producteurs Agricoles de l’Afrique de l’Ouest. Online at http://www.roppa.info/IMG/pdf/More_success_stories_in_Africa_Reij_Chris.pdf
  13. Reij C. 2008. Human Geographer, Center for International Cooperation, VU University Amsterdam. Personal communication. Feb. 17. Roots of Resilience WR 2008 report.
  14. Rinaudo T. 2005a. Uncovering the underground Forest: A short History and Description of Farmer Managed Natural Regenaration. Melbourne, Australia:World Vision. Online at http://www.frameweb.org/ev.php?ID=13091_201&ID2=DO-TOPIC
  15. Rinaudo T. 2007. Natural Resource Management Advisor, World vision Australia. Melbourne, Australia. Personal communication. Roots of Resilience WR 2008 report.
  16. Rowell DP. 1996. Response to comments by Sud and Lau: further analysis of simulated inter-decadal and inter-annual variability of summer rainfall over tropical North Africa. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 122, 1007- 1013.
  17. Steinberg D. 1988. Tree Planting for Soil Conservation: The Need for a Holistic and Flexible Approach. Enhancing Dryland Agriculture: LEISA Magazine, 4(4). Online at http://www.metafro.be/leisa/1988/4-4-20.pdf
  18. Sud YC, Lau WK. 1996. Comments on paper “Variability of summer rainfall over tropical North Africa (1906-1992): observations and modelling . Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 122, 1001-1006.
  19. Tougiani A, C Guero & T Rinaudo. 2008. Success in Improving Livelihoods Through Tree Crop Management and Use in Niger. To be published in GeoJournal. The Netherlands: Springer Publishing. Page numbers cited from manuscript.
  20. USAID (United States Agency for International Development), Institutional Resources Group, Winrock International, and Harvard Institute for International Development. 2002. Environmental Policy Lessons Learned: Report No. 21. Environmental Policy and Institutional Strengthening Indefinite Quantity Contract (EPIQ). Washington, DC: USAID.
  21. Warren A. 1995. Changing understanding of African pastoralism and the nature of the environmental paradigms. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 20, 193-203.
  22. Wentling M. 2008. Niger- Annual Food Security Report: Current Situation and Future Prospects. Niamey, Niger: United States Agency for International Development Niger.
  23. Winterbottom R. 2007. Senoir Manager, Environment and Natural Resources Division. International Resources Group, Washington, DC. Personal Communication. December. Roots of Resilience WR 2008 report.
  24. Winterbottom R. 2008. Senior Manager, Environment and Natural Resources Division. International Resources Group, Washington, DC Personal Communication. March 11. Roots of Resilience: World Resources 2008 report.
  25. Xue Y. & Shukla J. 1998. Model simulation of the influence of global SST anomalies on Sahel rainfall. Monthly Weather Review 126, 2782-2792.

Citation

Johnny Musumbu Tshimpanga, Garry Peterson, Reinette (Oonsie) Biggs, Elin Enfors. Maradi Agro-ecosystem. In: Regime Shifts Database, www.regimeshifts.org. Last revised 2017-02-07 12:32:20 GMT.
Tuesday, 15 February 2011 11:17

Freshwater Eutrophication

Freshwater Eutrophication

Main Contributors:

Juan Rocha, Reinette (Oonsie) Biggs, Garry Peterson

Other Contributors:

Steve Carpenter

Summary

Freshwater eutrophication refers to the excessive growth of aquatic plants or algal blooms, due to high levels of nutrients in freshwater ecosystems such as lakes, reservoirs and rivers. The main driver of freshwater eutrophication is nutrient pollution in the form of phosphorous from agricultural fertilizers, sewage effluent and urban storm water runoff. Beyond a certain threshold of phosphorous accumulation, a recycling mechanism is activated which can keep the system locked in a eutrophic state even when nutrient inputs are substantially reduced. Freshwater eutrophication can substantially impact ecosystem services affecting fisheries, recreation, aesthetics, and health.

Drivers

Key direct drivers

  • Vegetation conversion and habitat fragmentation
  • External inputs (eg fertilizers)
  • Species introduction or removal

Land use

  • Urban
  • Large-scale commercial crop cultivation
  • Intensive livestock production (eg feedlots)
  • Fisheries
  • Land use impacts are primarily off-site (e.g. dead zones)

Impacts

Ecosystem type

  • Freshwater lakes & rivers

Key Ecosystem Processes

  • Primary production
  • Nutrient cycling

Biodiversity

  • Biodiversity

Provisioning services

  • Freshwater
  • Fisheries
  • Wild animal and plant foods

Regulating services

  • Water purification

Cultural services

  • Recreation
  • Aesthetic values

Human Well-being

  • Food and nutrition
  • Health (eg toxins, disease)
  • Livelihoods and economic activity
  • Cultural, aesthetic and recreational values
  • Social conflict

Key Attributes

Typical spatial scale

  • Local/landscape

Typical time scale

  • Years
  • Decades

Reversibility

  • Irreversible (on 100 year time scale)
  • Hysteretic
  • Readily reversible

Evidence

  • Models
  • Paleo-observation
  • Contemporary observations
  • Experiments

Confidence: Existence of RS

  • Well established – Wide agreement in the literature that the RS exists

Confidence: Mechanism underlying RS

  • Well established – Wide agreement on the underlying mechanism

Links to other regime shifts

Alternate regimes

Productive Land Use Regime


The productive land use regime in Maradi Region as well as in the rest of Niger consists of a landscape characterised by sparse rural populations cultivating small fields amidst surrounding bush. Population densities are smaller with sufficient yields and ample supplies of timber and other forest products from natural woodlands. Fallow practices are common allowing fields to rest, and trees and shrubs are regenerated to provide extra wood before being cleared for planting (Winterbottom 2008). The most important feature of this regime is the fallow time which allows the environment to keep its natural productive capacity intact and provide a host of services such as soil and water conservation, increased soil fertility and goods among which food crops and fuel-wood in abundance. More importantly is that that productive period coincided with the wet decades that spanned from 1900 through with higher rainfalls during the 1920s, 1930s and 1950 (Hulme 2001).


Desert Regime 


The desert regime traces back to early 1960s, punctuated by the increasingly episode that commenced in the Sahel in the late 1960s, and which culminated in severe droughts in 1973, 1984 and 1990 (Warren 1995), and continues today. It is generally depicted as a regime characterised by an ongoing depreciation in ecosystem services and goods and moving towards a desert ecosystem. The landscapes are dominated by vast expanses of savannah devoid of vegetation under desertification threats until the early 1980s. This has resulted from a series of practices as a consequences of the enactment of institutional arrangements and enforced by both the French colonial government as well as the successive post-colonial governments. This regime regime illustrates high degrees of erosion and decreased soil fertility which has resulted in poverty and destitution translated into hunger, malnutrition, imbalanced diets and sometimes massive death.




Drivers and causes of the regime shift

Land clearing and tree-felling became common in the 1930s as the colonial administration pushed Nigerien farmers to grow export crops (cotton) and implemented policies that provided disincentives for farmers to care for their land (World Resources report 2008). Such disincentives included a new land law that established the national government as the owner of all trees and required Nigeriens to purchase permits to use them (Brough & Kimenyi 2002). By clearing native trees and shrubs, farmers exposed their lands to the fierce Sahara winds, resulting in plummeting soil fertility and harvests as a result of increased erosion. The loss of tree cover also triggered a rural fuel-wood crisis. Poor households were forced to burn animal dung or crop residues instead of using them for compost, reinforcing the downward spiral in soil quality and crop yields declines (Rinaudo 2007; Winterbottom 2008). Incidentally that resulted in an increase in intensity of cultivation of land reducing thus the fallow time to keep up with the production levels needed to feed an increasing human population which made it that woodlands were to be converted into farmland. That, in turn, contributed to land clearing and tree-felling and the cycle repeated itself in a reinforcing feedback loop.


 


The shrinking of Niger’s natural tree cover was exacerbated by a rapid population growth. That was a result of the perversely positive outcomes of the effective French health care system, notably higher life expectancy and lower infant mortality which incidentally increased a strain on natural resources (Brough & Kimenyi 2002). Therefore by 1975 much of the remaining natural woodland had been converted to farm fields to feed rapidly growing rural communities increasing consequently intensity of land cultivation which, in turn, reduces yield per hectare making food production one of recurrent problem for food security. As a result, the practice of fallow was abandoned altogether. By 2015, the Niger’s population will rise to 18.8 million and the area of cultivable land per capita will fall further- from 1.45 to 1.12 ha per person (Wentling 2008). But by clearing native trees and shrubs, farmers exposed their fields to the fierce winds, resulting in plummeting soil fertility and thereby harvests. In addition to the damaging effects of Sahara winds, the latter destroyed seeds in Niger’s June-to-October growing season that resulted more often in repeating sowing, destroying newly planted crops. The third and last driver is a series of an extreme 4-year drought that triggered famine across the Sahel in general through yield failures by impairing moisture in crop root zone, afflicting 50 million of people (Dan Baria 1999). Over the last 45 years, Niger has been plagued by an average of one bad harvest every eight years, following a growing season of low rainfall (Wentling 2008). That has exposed farmers to deadly cyclical droughts, which are predicted to increase as a result of climate change (Reij 2006; IPCC, 2007). These frequents droughts henceforth have increased rainfall variability that jeopardise bio-productivity of the system under study.


 


 


 


 

Impacts on ecosystem services and human well-being

The shift from a productive land use to a desert regime has direct impact on biodiversity of the area, causes soil erosion and decreases productivity therefore affecting provisioning services such as fuel-wood, and food for the local communities.


This has a direct impact on human wellbeing as it has increased poverty, hunger, malnutrition, imbalanced diets and sometimes even death.

Management options

Much of hope that has reversed desertification has come from the transformation of vast expanses of savannah devoid of vegetation into relatively densely studded landscapes with trees, shrubs, and crops. That has been achieved through an unprecedented, farmer-led re-greening movement initiated by the Maradi Integrated Development Project (MIDP) featuring a new approach to reforestation (Rinaudo 2005). This approach consists of low-cost techniques for managing the natural regeneration of trees and shrubs, known as farmer-managed natural regeneration, or FMNR. These techniques involved supporting the regeneration of trees and their sustainable management to produce continuous supplies of fuel-wood as well as non-timber products such as edible seeds and leaves. MIDP’s effort entailed few rules emphasizing farmer experimentation and choice. In fact, farmers chose how many trees stumps to let re-sprout in their fields, how many re-sprouted stems to grow and harvest, and what to do with the wood (Rinaudo 2005). By planting alternate rows of neem (Azadirachta indica) -an exotic nursery-grown species –and a native Acasia nilotica saplings across the valley to act as windbreaks, this techniques improved soil retention and fertility (Steinberg 1988). Re-vegetation also improves the traditional poor fertility of Niger’s soils, which in turn boosts crop production. Bush trees dotted across fields help hold soil in place, reducing wind and water erosion (Guero & Dan Lamso 2006). Moreover, the growing season on land with trees is longer because farmers only have to sow once, compared with twice or more on fields unprotected from the elements (Rinaudo 2005; Reij 2008). Such benefits are magnified when farmers act collectively. Vegetation in one field affects nearby land by serving as a windbreak and promoting improved water infiltration and soil retention (Winterbottom 2007). Besides the FMNR much of the success of the re-greening movement can also be attributed to the simultaneous soil and conservation work. In fact, simple soil and water conservation techniques were used to rehabilitate barren land. These widely adopted techniques consist of rock lining, improved versions of traditional planting pits or tasa, and demi-lunes that improve water infiltration into soil thereby increasing moisture in the root zone (Abdoulaye and Ibro, 2006). These techniques enabled cultivation of secondary vegetable crops such as onions, tomatoes, sweet potatoes, cow peas, watermelon, and asparagus for home use and sale in local markets (Guero & Dan Lamso 2006). This simple and cost-effective practice of farmer-managed natural regeneration has provided an impressively wide range of benefits for Niger’s impoverish rural communities. Over the last 30 years or so, about 200 million trees have been protected and managed by farmers in the FMNR regions and at least 250,000 ha of degraded land has been restored to crop production (Reij 2008; McGahuey & Winterbottom; 2007). On the other hand, there has been a perceptible trend in the increase in rainfall that has recently been noticed across the Sahel region as a whole that might also account for that change that is happening.

Alternate regimes

The shift from oligotrophic to eutrophic conditions occurs when a body of water – a lake, river or reservoir – accumulates excessive nutrients. This process can happen naturally over several centuries as a lake ages and accumulates sediments and nutrients from the surrounding landscape. Alternatively, human activities, especially the use of fertilizers, causes freshwater eutrophication to occur much more rapidly and extensively than in the past.


Low Nutrient Clear water/Oligotrophic


In the clear water regime, phosphorous inputs, phytoplankton biomass (algae), and phosphorous recycling from lake or river sediments are typically low, and the water is clear. Such systems are called oligotrophic. Oligotrophic lakes are associated with the provision of services such as freshwater, fisheries and food for wild animals. It is also related with pest and disease regulation as well as water purification. Clear water lakes are also used for recreation and their aesthetic values.


High Nutrient Turbid Water/Eutrophic


In the eutrophic regime, phosphorous inputs, phytoplankton biomass, and phosphorous recycling from sediments are usually high, and the water is turbid or murky. Such systems are called eutrophic or nutrient rich (Carpenter 2003, Smith and Schindler 2009).


Eutrophic lakes have significant impacts on fisheries, both commercial and recreational. Murky water and unpleasant odors cause loss of aesthetic value. Toxin produced by algae may affect livestock, mussels, oyster and even humans when water is used for drinking (Lawton and Codd 1991).

Drivers and causes of the regime shift

The main causes of lake eutrophication is excess nutrients inputs, especially phosphorous. Over enrichment of phosphorous often leads to algae blooms which changes both the trophic structure of the lake and the chemical environment. Consequences include depletion of oxygen in the water and increase in water turbidity, creating harsh conditions for fish and plants to survive.


Nutrient inputs are driven by the use of fertilizers in agriculture. Therefore, indirect drivers such as food demand and population growth exacerbate the problem. Rainfall variability also plays a synergistic role with land use change, allowing further erosion of soils and leaking of the nutrients not used by crops. Urban growth often increases the flux of nutrients by changing the landscape surface by one less permeable, increasing leakage and sewage production.  Untreated sewage is often a major cause of eutrophication near cities or towns.

How the regime shift works

Clear water or oligotrophic freshwater occur when nutrient inputs are low and nutrient concentrations are maintained at low levels by flora and fauna of the lake. The vegetation, for example, consumes phosphorous from the water column, and its roots immobilize phosphorous in the lake sediments by stabilizing the sediments. Phosphorous is also trapped in sediment or in inorganic forms, biologically unavailable for small algae.


Increasing nutrients input can overwhelm the capacity of plants to control phosphorous levels both by consumption and immobilization in sediment.  The ability of a freshwater ecosystem to regulate nutrients depends upon a number of ecological and geographic factors.  Ecological factors include the structure of the food web (the amount of predation on algae), the presence of vegetation (which shades or stabilizes the sediment), and the presence of sediment disturbing biota (which mobilizes nutrients).  While geographic factors include degree to which the lake is mixed by wind, temperature, and depth.  Increased mixing and temperature can decrease the resilience of the clear water regime by encouraging algae growth.


A lake can be maintained in a eutrophic or high nutrient regime, by changes in the food web that favour algae, continuation of sediment disturbance, or the mobilization of stored phosphorus due to chemical recycling due to low oxygen conditions in the sediment.

Impacts on ecosystem services and human well-being

Shift from Oligotrophic to Eutrophic lake


Eutrophication induces large changes in ecological communities and hence the configuration of food webs. Primary producers (algae) experience massive population increases, while fish and shellfish may suffer large population declines due to lack of oxygen. Consequently less energy is captured by higher trophic levels, and more by the lower trophic levels. Rooted aquatic plants tend to be lost due to shading by algae. The loss of macrophytes has cascading effects on zooplankton and other organisms that depend on these plants for habitat and food (Carpenter  2003).  These food web changes are accompanied by changes in the phosphorous and carbon cycles of the affected ecosystems: larger quantities of phosphorous and carbon are cycled through the ecosystem at higher rates. In addition, large swings in the amount of dissolved oxygen in the water may take place (Carpenter 2003).


Changes in the ecological communities resulting from eutrophication can make a system more vulnerable to invasion by new species or to disease outbreaks. Nutrient-rich waters are a good environment for the development of pathogens like cholera (Smith and Schindler 2009). Some algal blooms produce toxic compounds, such as neurotoxins, that can move up the food chain resulting in illness or death when consumed by animals or humans (Lawton and Codd 1991).


Eutrophication has several direct consequences for human well-being (Carpenter et al. 1998, Postel and Carpenter 1998):



  • Loss of fish species from eutrophic ecosystems impact commercial, subsistence, and recreational fishing;

  • Recreational use of water bodies for swimming, boating and angling are reduced,

  • The value of lakeside properties and recreational areas are reduced due to unpleasant odours and murky water,

  • The costs of water treatment for domestic, industrial and agricultural uses increases,

  • Toxins produced by certain algal blooms may cause death of livestock (and humans) if eutrophic water is used for drinking,

  • Biotoxins produced by algae may be taken up by shellfish such as mussels and oysters, and can lead to the poisoning of humans when consumed (Lawton and Codd 1991).


Shift from eutrophic to oligotrophic lake


The degree of reversibility from eutrophic to oligotrophic conditions varies greatly. In some lakes oligotrophic conditions have been restored rapidly after reduction of phosphorous inputs, while in other cases lakes have remained eutrophic despite prolonged reductions in phosphorous inputs and even dredging of the lake sediments (Carpenter et al. 1999, Carpenter 2003).


Ecosystem services may recover once the system shift back to oligotrophic regime. However, some species may never come back to initial abundance and the food web may change drastically. Consequently, the impact of eutrophication on fisheries depends upon the species being fished. Other services related with aesthetic and recreational values including tourism can fully recover.

Management options

Options for enhancing resilience


Freshwater ecosystems react in different ways to increases and reductions in nutrient loading, depending on their shape, water current patterns, and biological characteristics. Different strategies for managing eutrophication will therefore be required in different settings (Smith 2003).


The main management option, both for prevention and restoration, is to reduce phosphorous inputs. Developing technology and economic incentives to close the nutrient cycle at the local (farm) level is crucial (Diaz and Rosenberg 2008). Reforestation of watersheds can help buffer the impact of rainstorms on soil erosion and phosphorous runoff. Importantly, phosphorous sources tend to be concentrated spatially in the landscape. Reducing runoff from a small number of high source areas can have a major impact on water quality, and should be a priority.


Options for reducing resilience to encourage restoration or transformation


Active intervention may be needed to reverse eutrophic conditions. For instance, lake floor sediments can be dredged, or phosphorus can be immobilized by adding aluminium sulphate (Carpenter 2003). Bottom-feeding fish such as carp, which physically stir up lake-floor sediments when feeding, can also be removed.


Another option for managing eutrophication is through "biomanipulation" of food webs (Scheffer 1997). This involves increasing the population of predatory fish such as bass, pike and walleye through stocking or reduced angling quotas. Increased populations of these predators leads to a decrease in the level of zooplanktivores. This in turn allows an increase in the population of planktivores that graze on the algae, helping to reduce the algal density. Results from biomanipulation studies have given rise to the idea that, to reduce eutrophication, lakes should be managed to contain an even, rather than odd, number of trophic levels (Smith and Schindler 2009).

Key References

  1. Carpenter S, Ludwig D & Brock W. 1999. Management of eutrophication for lakes subject to potentially irreversible change. Ecological Applications 9(3), 751-771.
  2. Carpenter SR, Bolgrien D, Lathrop RC, Stow CA, Reed T & Wilson MA. 1998. Ecological and economic analysis of lake eutrophication by nonpoint pollution. Australian Journal of Ecology 23, 68-79.
  3. Carpenter, S. R. 2003. Regime shifts in lake ecosystems: pattern and variation. Book 15 in O. Kinne, editor. Excellence in ecology series. Ecology Institute, Oldendorf/Luhe, Germany.
  4. Hilt S, Köhler J, Kozerski H-P, van Nes EH & Scheffer M. 2011. Abrupt regime shifts in space and time along rivers and connected lake systems. Oikos 120: 766–775. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18553.x
  5. Lawton LA & Codd GA. 1991. Cyanobacterial (blue-green algae) toxins and their significance in UK and European waters. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 40, 87-97.
  6. Postel SL & Carpenter SR. 1997. Freshwater ecosystem services. In: Nature's Services. Daily GC (ed), pp. 195-214. Washington DC, USA.
  7. Scheffer M, Hosper SH, Meijer M-L, Moss B. & Jeppesen E. 1993. Alternative equilibria in shallow lakes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8, 275-279.
  8. Scheffer M. 1997. The ecology of shallow lakes. London: Chapman and Hall.
  9. Smith VH & Schindler DW. 2009. Eutrophication science: where do we go from here? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24(4), 201-207.
  10. Smith VH. 1998. Cultural eutrophication of inland, estuarine and coastal waters. In: Successes, limitations and frontiers in ecosystem science. Pace ML & Groffman PM (eds). pp.7-49. New York, USA: Springer-Verlag.
  11. Smith VH. 2003. Eutrophication of freshwater and coastal marine ecosystems. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 10, 126-139.

Citation

Juan Rocha, Reinette (Oonsie) Biggs, Garry Peterson, Steve Carpenter. Freshwater Eutrophication. In: Regime Shifts Database, www.regimeshifts.org. Last revised 2017-01-23 08:58:21 GMT.
Page 4 of 4