Message

Rate this item
(0 votes)

Arctic Sea-Ice Loss

Main Contributors:

Rolands Sadauskis

Other Contributors:

Reinette (Oonsie) Biggs, Garry Peterson, Juan Carlos Rocha

Summary

A regime shift towards a summer ice-free Arctic is occurring in response to Arctic warming that is demonstrated by reductions in sea ice surface area and ice volume during the summers. A summer ice-loss threshold, if not already passed, is expected to occur well within 21st century. The main driver behind the shift is the increased concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere – particularly CO2 that is contributing to the increase in average global temperature. Several feedback mechanisms have been proposed that may help maintain the reductions in Arctic ice under the new regime. The primary and best understood is the ice-albedo feedback mechanism where greenhouse gases are causing increased air temperature near the ground/ice surface leading to rapid decrease in ice surface area and volume. Current management strategies primarily relate to the decrease of greenhouse gas emissions on a global scale.

Drivers

Key direct drivers

  • Global climate change

Impacts

Ecosystem type

  • Marine & coastal
  • Polar

Key Ecosystem Processes

  • Water cycling

Biodiversity

  • Biodiversity

Provisioning services

  • Fisheries
  • Wild animal and plant foods

Regulating services

  • Climate regulation
  • Water regulation

Cultural services

  • Aesthetic values
  • Knowledge and educational values
  • Spiritual and religious

Human Well-being

  • Food and nutrition
  • Livelihoods and economic activity
  • Security of housing & infrastructure
  • Cultural, aesthetic and recreational values
  • Cultural identity

Key Attributes

Typical spatial scale

  • Sub-continental/regional

Typical time scale

  • Decades

Reversibility

  • Irreversible (on 100 year time scale)
  • Unknown

Evidence

  • Models
  • Paleo-observation
  • Contemporary observations

Confidence: Existence of RS

  • Contested – Reasonable evidence both for and against the existence of RS

Confidence: Mechanism underlying RS

  • Well established – Wide agreement on the underlying mechanism

Links to other regime shifts

Alternate regimes

The system is defined by the ice volume and the territory it covers in the Arctic Ocean and the regional/global processes that ensure the existence of ice in this area. The loss of surface area and thinning of Arctic sea ice has not occurred at a linear rate which may be indicative of a systematic change towards an alternate regime.

Arctic with summer ice

Under this regime, the Arctic Ocean has an abundance of sea ice.  It is characterized by very long and cold winters, during which the ice surface area and thickness reach their maximum. The low winter temperatures and short summer help to maximize the sea ice surface area and volume over time.

Arctic without summer ice

In this regime the surface area and volume of summer sea ice in the Arctic rapidly decreases due to atmospheric warming caused by greenhouse gases. In summer when open water surface area is greater, the albedo is reduced, which causes greater absorption of solar radiation.  This raises the temperature of the water and ice, which facilitates greater losses in sea ice surface area and volume. Several models predict that ice free Arctic conditions in summer will be reached within this century (Arzel et al. 2006). Several authors have suggested that the system has already surpassed a tipping point, but convincing evidence is lacking (Lenton et al. 2008).

Drivers and causes of the regime shift

The main driver of this regime shift is elevated greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere causing an increase in arctic air temperatures. This global driver is well established and could be looked as irreversible in the scale of next hundred years. In regards to the loss of sea ice in the Arctic, the regime shift is generally considered to be irreversible unless the main driver (increased atmospheric temperatures resulting from climate change) is changed in the near future.

Anthropogenic activities that elevate atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations are generally considered to be the primary driver of climate change (IPCC 2007; Kinnard et. al 2011). Carbon release from anthropogenic sources is projected to continue and increase during the coming decades (IPCC 2007). This is expected to contribute to an increase in average global temperatures and more rapid decrease in sea ice cover and thickness in the Arctic. This driver initially affects the main ice-albedo mechanism thus changing the processes that characterize its initial state. Once the main mechanism has shifted the driver and the altered ice-albedo mechanism initiates change in other parts of the system.

How the regime shift works

The Arctic with summer ice regime is maintained by permanent low surface air temperatures (SAT) that maintain the thermal balance, thus ensuring balanced heat exchange between the atmosphere, sea ice, and water. The result is maintained sea ice volume, thickness and surface area. This occurs due to ensuring high albedo (a measure of reflectance) level as the dark ocean surface absorbs more solar radiation than the sea ice (Lindsay et al. 2005). This means that the high albedo reflects more radiation avoiding surface temperature increase. Avoiding increased absorption of solar energy promotes lower air, ice, water and land temperatures which lead towards maintaining sea ice. In the end, the low temperatures further promote ice maintaining arctic conditions.

There is near universal agreement that the extent of Arctic sea ice will decline through the 21st century in response to increasing atmospheric greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations (Zhang 2006). The resulting increase in surface air temperatures (SAT) change the thermal balance which means that the heat exchange between the atmosphere, sea ice, and water is changed. The result is a decrease in sea ice volume, thickness and surface area. The increased area of open water in summer decreases the albedo as the dark ocean surface absorbs more solar radiation than the sea ice (Lindsay et al. 2005).  Increased absorption of solar energy promotes higher air, ice, water and land temperatures which lead towards degrading sea ice volume (Rigor et al. 2002; Holland et al. 2006). In the end, the increasing temperatures and accumulated heat further promote warming arctic conditions

Changes in the summer extent of Arctic sea ice are not solely forced by SATs, but could also be affected by fluctuations of atmospheric pressure at sea level that controls the strength and direction of windsin the region. More probably these changes could be driven by a combination of these (and/or other) forcing (Kinnard et al. 2011).

Impacts on ecosystem services and human well-being

Local knowledge and spiritual values might be lost as the local communities have to adapt to the new circumstances and thus their lifestyle. In addition to concerns about the security of infrastructure and impacts on human well being, ice free Arctic summers have important impacts on ecosystems. One such impact is that loss of ice cover could affect the Arctic's freshwater system and surface energy budget, and manifest in middle latitudes as altered patterns in atmospheric circulation and precipitation (Serreze et al. 2007). This presents the way how water and atmospheric circulations could be altered as ecosystem services.

Summer sea ice concentration is important for navigation, and may have implications for the transport of sediments and pollutants across the Arctic. Most of the sea ice formed in the Arctic Ocean is exported through the Fram Strait into the Greenland Sea and to the North Atlantic where the ice may affect the global thermohaline circulation (Rigor et al. 2002). Sea ice also blocks the solar flux to the water and hence is a major control factor phytoplankton to seals, walrus, and polar bears while limiting access to the surface for seals and whales (Lindsay et al. 2005).

The rapidly melting sea ice in the Arctic Ocean has increased political and economic interest in the region's resource extraction and in the potential for more accessible shipping routes. By opening the Northwest passage, shipping route through the northern Canadian waters, could result in a positive economic impact. Although this also could potentially result in ecological disasters as the possibility of oil spills and other disasters associated with development would increase.

Management options

The options for preventing or reversing the loss of summer sea ice in the Arctic primarily relate to the decrease of greenhouse gas emissions on a global scale to reduce climatic warming. As atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations increase, it is essential to understand local and regional actions that may influence the feedback mechanisms influencing the shift to an ice free summer Arctic. Technology transfer could be a good initiative from developed countries as they can provide more advanced technological solutions to developing countries to help accelerate the learning curve on GHG emissions. A Global response particularly from developed nations that are using the majority of the world’s resources on a per capita basis should be in place to deal with such complex system.

Key References

  1. Arzel O, Fichefet T, Goosse H. 2006. Sea ice evolution over the 20th and 21st centuries as simulated by current AOGCMs. Ocean Model 12,401.
  2. Bitz CM, and Roe GH. 2004. A mechanism for the high rate of sea ice thinning in the Arctic Ocean. J. Climate 17,3622–3631.
  3. Dickson RR, Osborn TJ, Hurrell JW, Meincke J, Blindheim J, Adlandsvik B, Vinje T, Alekseev G, Maslowski W. 2000. The Arctic Ocean Response to the North Atlantic Oscillation. J. Clim. 13,2671.
  4. Francis, J. A. & Vavrus, S. J. Evidence linking Arctic amplification to extreme weather in mid-latitudes. Geophys Res Lett 39, L06801– (2012).
  5. Holland MM, Bitz CM, and Tremblay B. 2006. Future abrupt reductions in the summer Arctic sea ice. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33
  6. IPCC 2007. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge University Press, New York.
  7. Johnson MA, and Polyakov IV. 2001. The Laptev Sea as a source for recent Arctic Ocean salinity changes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28,2017-2020.
  8. Lenton TM, Held H, Kriegler E, Hall JW, Lucht W, Rahmstorf S, and Schellnhuber HJ. 2008.Tipping elements in the Earth’s climate system. PNAS 105(6),1786-1793.
  9. Lindsay RW, and Zhang. 2005. The Thinning of Arctic Sea Ice, 1988–2003: Have We Passed a Tipping Point? Journal of Climate 18(22),4879-4894.
  10. Prange M, and Lohman G. 2003. Effects of mid-Holocene river runoff on the Arctic ocean/sea-ice system: a numerical model study. The Holocene 13,335–342.
  11. Rigor IG, and Wallace JM. 2004. Variations in the age of sea-ice and summer sea-ice extent. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31.
  12. Rigor IG, Wallace JM, and Colony RL. 2002. Response of sea ice to the Arctic Oscillation. J. Climate 15,2648–2668.
  13. Serreze MC, Holland MM, Stroeve J. 2007. Perspectives on the Arctic's Shrinking Sea-Ice Cover. Science 315(5818),1533 - 1536.
  14. Steele M, and Boyd T. 1998. Retreat of the cold halocline layer in the Arctic Ocean. J.Geophys. Res 103,10419–10435.
  15. Stroeve J, Holland MM, Meier W, Scambos T, and Serreze M. 2007. Arctic sea ice decline: Faster than forecast. Geophysical research letters 34.
  16. Zhang J, Rothrock D, and Steele M. 2000. Recent changes in Arctic sea ice: The interplay between ice dynamics and thermodynamics. J. Climate 13,3099–3114.
  17. Zhang X, and Walsh JE. 2006. Towards a seasonally ice-covered Arctic Ocean: Scenarios from the IPCC AR4 simulations. Journal of Climate 19,1730– 1747.

Citation

Rolands Sadauskis, Reinette (Oonsie) Biggs, Garry Peterson, Juan Carlos Rocha. Arctic Sea-Ice Loss. In: Regime Shifts Database, www.regimeshifts.org. Last revised 2017-05-12 07:38:48 GMT.
Read 16487 times
Login to post comments